LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter




Sponsors





Events

Barton Myers: Works of Architecture and Urbanism
September 12–December 12, 2014
With works as varied as a Vidal Sassoon Salon from 1968, the U.S. Expo Pavilion in Seville, Spain in 1992, and his steel houses, this exhibit will present an overview of almost fifty years of architecture. Barton Myers first attracted attention in the late 1960s for his civic buildings and urban projects in Canada. He returned to the United States in 1984 to open a Los Angeles office and became known for his performing arts centers, campus buildings, and steel houses among many projects. 

The Barton Myers papers were donated to the Architecture and Design Collection of the AD&A Museum, UC Santa Barbara in 2000.  The archive covers Myers’s work from 1968 through 2002 and includes sketches and computer drawings, watercolors, images by well-known photographers, detailed study models and models of blocks-long sections of cities, as well as research notes, correspondence, lectures, and writings.

The West Hollywood Design District Presents Decades of Design 1948–2014
November 19, 2014–February 2015
The first-ever retrospective exhibition uncovering, examining and celebrating six decades of rich design history in West Hollywood. The curated ­­gallery will showcase design pioneers and present tastemakers through bold graphics, photographs and original product.

Heath Ceramics Annual Sale
November 21–25, 2014
Heath's annual sale at their locations in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sausalito offer deals on merchandise along with special presentations.

FOG Design + Art Fair
January 15–18, 2015
Benefiting the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA), FOG Design+Art is a four-day celebration and exploration of modern and contemporary design, architecture, and art with dynamic exhibits, custom installations, art galleries, lectures, and discussions with leaders in the art and design worlds.

 

 

Competitions

Registration Opens: October 1
Breaking New Ground
The California Endowment

Deadlne: November 30
Sir Geoffrey Jellicoe Award
International Federation of Landscape Architects (IFLA)

Deadline: December 8

2015 Diversity Scholarship
Gensler

Deadline: December 15
2015 Preservation Awards
Santa Monica Conservancy 

Deadline: December 31
Kitchen Design Contest
Wolf and Sub-Zero 

Deadline: January 16
Ceramics of Italy Tile Competition 2015
Ceramics of Italy 

Deadline: February 23
I Like Design
Interiors & Sources 

FORM Event Images

Industry Partners

  

  




















 

Hidden
« Showroom: Surface Matters | Main | Showroom: Everything in Its Place »
Thursday
Aug082013

Building Your Business: Talking Ownership Transitions with Bill Mandel and Laura Howard

Bill Mandel and Laura Terry Howard, of MBV Law, talk ownership transitions for architecture, design and engineering firms. Image Anne Hamersky/courtesy MBV LawRecently, we brought you the story of Nadel Architects ownership transition, as part of our continuing series on building and growing your business. We were intrigued by the process and wanted to get more details on the nuts and bolts of ownership transitions in general. We went right to the source: attorney Bill Mandel, who handled the ownership transition plan for Nadel Architects, and his partner Laura Terry Howard. At their San Francisco–based firm MBV Law, Mandel specializes in transition planning for architecture, engineering and design firms, including mergers and acquisitions and ownership transition programs, while Howard's practice area runs from addressing formation issues in the start-up phase to developing and implementing an exit strategy. Here, they give us more insight into a critical process in the life of a firm—when done right, it can mean thriving for decades to come. 

What are some transition scenarios? 

Laura Terry Howard: There are a number of choices one might have. You could sell the firm to an outside buyer or close the doors. Our experience is that selling to an outside buyer isn’t impossible, but it’s a different transaction to engineer and it’s not really common. The more viable alternative is to look around your organization and see who could be owners. Ownership transition doesn’t result in the absolute highest value to a selling owner, but over the lifetime of the program the owner will be well compensated. If you close the doors, you will get very little value. If you sell to someone outside, you’ll get a higher value but give up all control. Giving that up isn’t really appealing to a lot of people.

Bill Mandel: Of the merger-and-acquisition deals we’ve done, very few have been for architecture firms. Architecture firms aren’t as prone to being acquired, because their cultures are unique and, therefore, are hard to merge into another firm. Generally, architects are limited to doing an ownership transition program or closing the firm.

When do you start planning for an ownership transition?

Bill Mandel: Starting early is best—at least 10 years before a founder (owner) is ready to exit the firm. That gives time to identify candidates for ownership and bring them on board. There are often hits and misses. Sometimes candidates don't work out as owners, so you need time to regroup and find other people. You should start no less than five years before exiting, because you need time to craft a good transition program.

How do you identify future owners?

Bill Mandel: You look at the firm’s needs: do you need good marketers, good project managers, and/or good administrators? In all cases, candidates should have a sense of entrepreneurship and risk taking. Sometimes it’s difficult to identify the best candidates. We work with consultants who are well versed in evaluating candidates to get a good assessment. Founders are often not in a very good position to evaluate candidates, because they are too close to the candidates and aren't able to view them with objectivity.

We advise our clients to always look for new candidates. Keep your eyes open for the next generation. We had a case where a client only offered ownership to the most senior people. There were terrific people in the generation after and those folks walked out and formed their own firm, creating real competition for the firm they left.

Laura Terry Howard: It can be difficult to find people in the next generation that have all the qualifications and skills you may want. You may see a collective formed that will have the necessary skills.

Sometimes candidates won’t tell the founders what they really think about becoming an owner. The founders may believe they have three or four candidates ready to go, but the consultants might find they’re not interested in being owners.

What is involved with an ownership transition plan? 

Bill Mandel: A direct ownership plan involves a sale of stock from the founders to candidates. The program establishes the value of the company, using a formula that will be applied for all future purchases and sales of the firm's stock. We tell our client founders that candidates are interested in the three "C's": Cost, Compensation and Control. How much will the ownership cost the candidate, what will their compensation be as owners and what kind of control will they have (a say in decision-making). We generally advise clients to start with a small amount of ownership and see how it works. If it works, you can sell more stock.

How do you pitch it to employees?

Bill Mandel: We develop the plan with the owners and then present it to the candidates. We find that our programs have a high degree of acceptance. You start off spending time with the founder going through the road map and putting together a term sheet. Then we sit down with the owner and candidates, discuss the term sheet with them and ask them to go off and talk to their attorneys, spouses and other advisers. And let us know if they want to proceed with the program Once the candidate has indicated a willingness to proceed, we will prepare the legal documents and meet with the candidates to review them. If a program has the right elements and is seen as affordable and beneficial, there is a high likelihood that the candidates will accept it. We also explain the obligations that candidates have to take on, so they understand the risk element in being owners. Rewards of being an owner rarely come without some risk.

Laura Terry Howard: One of the biggest challenges we often face is that we have to show founders that the price paid is going to be fair to them. It might not be as high as if the firm were sold to an outside buyer. They have to look at it objectively, look at the people buying in, recognizing they have other financial obligations—so it has to be affordable to candidates. If it’s not affordable, then no one will buy it. The other big challenge is control of the firm. When we talk to founders, they’ve been controlling their own destiny and aren’t used to giving up control. Ownership transition requires a frank discussion between founders and candidates about changes in leadership and governance after the buy-in.

What are the advantages of having a clearly delineated transition plan in place? 

Bill Mandel: It provides for an orderly transition of ownership and leadership and allows the founder to have partners to share in the responsibilities of running the firm. It’s also an effective method of attracting and retaining key people. It also creates sustainability for the firm. Another benefit is that people who are being recruited for employment by more than one firm are likely to go with the one with an established ownership transition program. 

Laura Terry Howard: It’s all about the talent and intellectual capital and keeping it within a firm. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>